
Julia Ingram at CBS News reported yesterday that the Food and Drug Administration carried out just under a thousand foreign food safety inspections in 2025, and that the plant its own traceback later named in this outbreak was not one of them. The last time an FDA investigator walked into Taylor Farms de Mexico at Doctor Mora, Guanajuato, was 2019. The time before that was August 2013, and that visit happened during an outbreak that infected 631 people in twenty-five states with Cyclospora.
I went looking for both records. Only one of them exists as a document, and the reason the other one does not is the more important story. Every source below is linked so anyone can check the work, and where a document is not public, I say so and say what we are doing about it.
The 2013 record is public, and I have written about it more than once. It is FDA’s environmental assessment, conducted that August with COFEPRIS, SENASICA, SAGARPA, CESAVEG, Guanajuato state health authorities and CDC. It is not an inspection report and should not be called one; CBS calls it a review, which is closer. It walks the processing plant and five ranches, catalogs roughly 835 samples, records that the facility washed combined salad components in recycled wash water and concludes without determining how or where contamination occurred. Its second recommendation was that the firm determine whether Cyclospora is a reasonably likely hazard in that growing region and, if it is, re-evaluate the wash step. Same region, same facility, same parasite, same commodity, thirteen years later.
The 2019 record is not a document at all, and nobody is hiding it. The inspection found no violations. No violations means no Form FDA 483 was issued. No 483 means there is nothing for FDA to publish, because the agency posts inspectional observations in its reading room and only when observations were written. What exists instead is a row in a spreadsheet: the firm’s name, its establishment identifier, the date the inspection ended, the project area, a three-letter classification, and a column indicating whether any citations were posted. For this facility that column reads no. That row is the entire public record of the last time the United States government set foot in the plant that FDA’s traceback would name seven years later.
CNN got one step further on August 6. Its reporters established from public records that the 2019 inspection was conducted by Wendy Johnecheck, now an extension professor of food safety at the University of New Hampshire. She declined to discuss Taylor Farms or the inspection. Speaking generally, she described an enormous range of infrastructure and sanitation practice on farms across Mexico, some of it more sophisticated than almost anything in the United States. That, and the fact that she issued no citations, is the sum of what the public knows about the visit.
What I would like to know is what she was sent there to look at, and there is a way to find out. The narrative account of any FDA inspection is the establishment inspection report, and an EIR can be requested under the Freedom of Information Act whether or not observations were issued. This week my firm is filing FOIA requests with FDA’s Division of Freedom of Information for the establishment inspection reports covering all three visits to this facility — the routine inspection in 2011, the outbreak response in August 2013, and the inspection in 2019 — along with the assignment and any sample collection records associated with each. I will publish what comes back. If the answer is that no responsive records exist, or that they are being withheld while an enforcement action is pending, I will publish that too, because that answer is itself worth knowing.
Three weeks ago, I wrote that I had looked for other FDA inspection reports on this facility, could not find any, and assumed they must exist. They do. The public record shows three visits. Two of them produced nothing a member of the public can read: the routine 2011 inspection FDA described at the time as turning up no notable issues, and 2019.
That gap matters because 2019 is the only visit sitting between the 2013 assessment and this outbreak, and 2013 left two obligations behind. One was the recommendation to make a hazard determination and revisit the wash step. The other was the price of reopening: FDA allowed the plant to resume shipping on August 25, 2013, and said its decision rested in part on the environmental assessment and in part on its review of a Cyclospora product sampling plan the company had put in place, alongside its commitment to a broader program covering both its products and its water. I have already written that thirteen years later I cannot find one public result from that program. The 2019 inspection was the single opportunity anyone had to ask whether it ever ran. Whether anyone asked is sitting in an EIR that, as far as I can tell, nobody has requested. Now somebody has.
Now the scale of the thing. The Food Safety Modernization Act set a rising annual target for foreign inspections and capped it at 19,200 beginning in 2016. FDA has never reached even ten percent of that number in the decade since, under administrations of both parties. The agency told the Government Accountability Office as early as 2015 that the figure was unworkable, then ran its own analysis putting the number it actually needed at 4,700 and never carried that number to Congress. GAO pressed the point again this past January. Foreign food inspections fell twenty-nine percent last year, to the lowest count outside the pandemic since 2011. FDA had 432 inspectors in 2024, twenty of them assigned to foreign work, against the 5,000 inspectors FSMA directed the agency to hire, a number FDA says it has never had the budget to reach. At roughly $38,700 per foreign inspection, meeting the statute Congress wrote would cost about $743 million a year, more than a tenth of the entire agency budget. The mandate has been on the books for a decade, and nobody has either funded it or repealed it.
Set those numbers against this company. Taylor Farms’ Mexican subsidiaries are the source of more vegetable and salad shipments into the United States than any other single manufacturer in the world, according to the FDA import data CNN reviewed. In the first six months of this year, five of the company’s more than 168,000 produce shipments from Mexico were physically examined by FDA at the border. Five.
None of this is concealment. It is design. Federal law places the primary burden of verifying a foreign supplier on the American importer, which in practice means paperwork about a supplier rather than anyone walking the field. The day-to-day work of food safety sits with the company. Taylor Farms says it invests $200 million a year in food safety protocols and independent audits. That is a real number, and as Food Safety News pointed out, it is also under three percent of the roughly seven billion dollars in annual revenue Forbes estimates for the company, spread across every plant and every product line it runs. The public has no way to audit any of it, because the audits are private and the one government witness who could have described the plant came and went in 2019 without writing anything down.
Here is the asymmetry I keep running into, and it is not unique to this company. When a plant is clean, or at least when an investigator documents nothing objectionable in the project areas covered on the days he happened to be there, the public gets a row in a table. When people get sick, the public gets a document. Every substantive thing anyone knows about Doctor Mora comes out of the 2013 assessment: the recycled wash water, the positive fecal coliform result off drip irrigation tape that triggered no corrective action because it fell below the firm’s own action level, the recycled wash water sample that came back inconclusive because turbidity defeated the filtration method, the antibiotic prescriptions written for harvest crews during the outbreak window. Every line of that exists because 631 people were already infected. The same is true of the 2024 Colorado Springs report, which exists because an E. coli outbreak tied to onions put people in the hospital.
We have built a system in which the most reliable way to learn something real about a food plant is for that plant to hurt somebody first. That is a strange thing to have built on purpose, and it is worth saying plainly that it was not built by this administration or the last one. It has been the arrangement for as long as I have been doing this.
Three things would help, and none of them require new legislation. FDA should release the establishment inspection reports for all three visits to this facility rather than waiting on the FOIA requests we are filing, because a request that takes eighteen months to answer is not transparency in the middle of an outbreak this size. The congressional letters already on the table demand documents from the company going back to January 1, 2013; the same committees should be demanding FDA’s own file on the plant, which is smaller, faster to produce, and written by people with no stake in the answer. And a classification of no action indicated should not be the end of the public record for a foreign facility shipping at this volume. Publishing the scope of a foreign inspection, what was covered, over how many days, by how many people, would cost the agency almost nothing and would let the rest of us tell the difference between a plant that was examined and found sound and a plant that was merely visited.
I have spent thirty-three years reading documents that exist only because somebody ended up in a hospital bed. The 2013 assessment is one of them. The 2024 Colorado report is another. There is no 2019 document, and that absence is not evidence that nothing was wrong at Doctor Mora in 2019. It is evidence that nothing was written down. In a system this thin, those two things have become the same thing, and the fifty-state countI have been keeping since July is now past twenty-eight thousand people.










